|
|
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 2345> |
| Author |
 Share Topic Printable Version Google Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks reddit Facebook MySpace Newsvine Furl Topic Search  Topic Options
|
NWRPodder 
Newbie 
Joined: 17 Sep 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 18 |
 Topic: Pushing The Limits On Tow VehiclesPosted: 15 Jan 2017 at 1:23pm |
|
Thanks John! I think that is something to seriously look at as well in similar price range and features. I will check those out too. I am not a fast driver with or without a trailer so that is not really of concern to me.
|
|
|
2016 R178
2007 Ford Expedition V8 5.4L |
|
 |
|
|
marwayne
Senior Member 
Joined: 25 Oct 2011 Location: Edmonton AB Can Online Status: Offline Posts: 1002 |
Posted: 15 Jan 2017 at 2:04pm |
|
NWRPodder: I hate to burst your bubble, but your dry weight is a lot closer to 3000 # than you think. Consider, 178 dry weight 2535 # Than you add AC, one LP tank, one battery, microwave, your looking at a minimum of 2800 # and you haven't put anything into the pod. That is why I suggest to people to weigh there trailer when picking it up from the dealer.
|
|
|
If you want something done right, do it yourself.
2011 RP172, 2016 Tundra 5.7 Litre, Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
birderdiane526
Senior Member
Joined: 08 May 2016 Location: Texas Online Status: Offline Posts: 320 |
Posted: 15 Jan 2017 at 7:54pm |
|
Hi,
We tow a 179 with a 2004 4Runner with a WDH and E2 anti-sway bars. No issues with this. But climbing mountains in the west caused overheating so we want to add a tranny cooler. We are full-timers and keep storage bins in the 4Runner cargo area. Also, I started a thread called Towing capacity and lots of great information was posted. You might want to search for this. |
|
|
Diane and Michael
2016 179 "PIP" (PODDING IN PARADISE) 2007 Toyota Tundra BLOG:Podding in Paradise, birderdiane526.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
Tars Tarkas
Senior Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2013 Location: Near Nashville Online Status: Offline Posts: 1447 |
Posted: 15 Jan 2017 at 9:11pm |
I added a transmission cooler to my FJ Cruiser last summer before a trip to the Rockies. What a difference! I have a Scanguage to watch my transmission fluid temp, and with the aux cooler it runs a good 30 degrees cooler than before. It is very important, regardless, to run in 4th gear all the time, assuming you have a 5-speed automatic. It's the changing of gears that heats things up. Transmission fluid temp is not the same as coolant temp. When people talk of overheating they are usually talking about coolant temps. In my FJ, the transmission fluid runs through the coolant radiator (inside its own plumbing), so the two are kind of related, but a transmission cooler will have very little effect on your coolant temp. You may need an auxiliary fan or a larger radiator if your coolant is getting too hot. Anyway, I recommend an aux. tranny cooler, but highly recommend keeping the tranny in 4th (or lower going up or down long grades) when towing your pod. TT |
|
|
2010 176
FJ Cruiser |
|
|
|
|
NWRPodder
Newbie
Joined: 17 Sep 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 18 |
Posted: 16 Jan 2017 at 9:52am |
|
Marwayne, you bring up good points about the dry weight. That said I truly don’t think I am much over 3k lbs with what you mention. There is little stored in our Rpod and water/waste tanks are always empty. I would estimate everything in the pod weighed together that we travel with would be 200 to 250 lbs but I could be wrong. Never weighed it which would be interesting to do. Birdediane526, thanks for the info on the towing thread. I will check that out. I assume you 04 4Runner is the v6 model. I have seen more than a handful comments about a tranny cooler. I will install one if I keep my current rig which seems unlikely long term. Tars Tarkas, I assume even if you are running in 4th gear on a 5 spd that it’s better/easier than running in 4th on a 4spd but someone let me know if I am way off here. All good info, thanks! |
|
|
2016 R178
2007 Ford Expedition V8 5.4L |
|
|
|
|
texman
Senior Member
Joined: 24 Jul 2014 Location: TeXas Online Status: Offline Posts: 446 |
Posted: 16 Jan 2017 at 10:32am |
|
just 2 cents to the topic that will never be settled:
As i read through all the post in this forum, the general message that i glean is that V6 mid size TVs are the norm for Rpods. I think that is because the Rpod represents itself as a lightweight trailer and the thinking is my midsize will tow the Rpod. From this discussion, that is true, the V6 midsize will tow it. The other theme i see in this discussion is the need to modify these midsize TVs with transmission coolers, modification of driving by downshifting, getting comfortable with higher RPMs while towing, anti-sway bars, etc. etc. I have owned V6 midsize vehicles: Ford Ranger 4.0 ltr, Toyota FJ, Ford Explorer. Yes, they will tow. Yes they get marginally better mpg than a full-size. Not enough mpg gain IMO. They are lighter, smaller and less power and will do the job but require a bit of finesse to keep temps in check and require screaming rpms on climbs and more braking or downshifting on declines and have less room for stuff. If you are the pod owner that only takes short trips and does not encounter challenging travel conditions (grades, wind, off-road, etc) then these mid-sizes will serve you well, as long as you are patient and understand the what they have to offer. What puzzles me about this, is why the full size V8s vehicles are less considered? I have a Tundra 5.7l 4x4 and have owned many 1/2 ton vehicles. F150, chevy, sequoia, expedition, and this is my 3rd Tundra. I have towed small trailers and the pod with only the 1/2 ton class. The price difference IMO is negligible when looking at total cost of ownership including residual values. (just my judgement from 20yrs as a CPA) There are many situations where even these full sized TVs are tested a bit. Headwinds, climbs, declines, rough pavement and off road. The two main conditions are Headwinds and climbs. And, honestly, the headwind is the most challenging. You cant overcome it comfortably and the gusts causes swerves and turns the minutes to days. Rough pavement can cause any trailer to literally bounce and depend on the TV to realign its path. Heavier TV better here or lower speeds or both. Off Road to that favorite spot is usually not paved, rough, narrow, and subject to rain and snow making it worse. Nothing worse than being stuck boon docking and trying to find help. Another problem is the sidewind. Especially side-wind on Rvs in general. You see them turned over all the time in my part of the world. Sidewind also causes fishtailing and accidents. The heavier full-size TV has a definite advantage here. The engineers here could tell you what the force of a 50+mph gust to the broad side of an Rpod is. It is enough to make the butt eat the seat, i know that. My Tundra, even with a 10k tow rating, works hard in the headwind and climb situations. I remember a strong headwind of 25+mph that i could only maintain 60 mph comfortably without running at 4k+ rpms for hours. I don't think 4k rpm is acceptable for hours. Climbs challenge every TV, just normal, but more horsepower and more torque win here as well. Declines and braking capacity is important as well. The mid-sized are lighter and require more attention here resulting in shorter brake life and more transmission stress. To wrap up, Both Full and Mid vehicles will get you there. I think the folks that are new to towing, need to consider more that just towing capacity when looking for a TV. Consider you plans for the POD and are you a weekend 100 mile warrior or heading from California to Texas to Florida to Alaska, boondocking, mountain passes, sloppy muddy roads, sand, etc. Tho more miles that you travel, the more situations that you will encounter that challenge your choice of equipment and your resulting pleasure or displeasure. The Rpod is definitely a light weight RV. But, it still weighs aprox. 3k #s. And it has a taller profile than your TV and a broad side profile as well. Smaller TVs are better when not towing. But when Towing, the Full size is much more comfortable. By comfortable i mean the following: driver comfort for surprise road conditions, for braking, climbing, interior room, and more space for stuff. I prefer them as a day to day driving vehicle as well. So the decision is easy for me. Texman |
|
|
|
|
mjlrpod
Senior Member
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 Location: Massachusetts Online Status: Offline Posts: 1215 |
Posted: 16 Jan 2017 at 6:49pm |
NWRpodder? you are aware that the people in your vehicle count as tow weight right? a full tank of gas adds several hundred pounds of tow weight. It's easy to underestimate the load. I was unaware till a short time ago that cargo counts. I used to think as long as the weight wasnt in the trailer, it doesnt count.
|
|
|
2017.5 Rp-172
2020 R-pod 195 2015 Frontier sv 4.0L 6cyl I'll be rpodding |
|
|
|
|
mcarter
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 07 Apr 2016 Location: Greenbrier, TN Online Status: Offline Posts: 3419 |
Posted: 17 Jan 2017 at 2:09pm |
|
+1 to Mjlrod, I figure with the RPod, my wife and I, 80 lb bulldog and all I carry in bed of truck, just in case and coolers, the Pod, 3500-4000 is a good estimate. I'm at 80% or close to it. The tool for estimating is a great help, plus real user comments.
|
|
|
Mike Carter
2015 178 " I had the right to remain silent, I just didn't have the ability." |
|
|
|
|
NWRPodder
Newbie
Joined: 17 Sep 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 18 |
Posted: 11 Jun 2017 at 7:56pm |
|
Hi folks. I wanted to provide an update to this thread for all of you that weighed in with advice. It was greatly appreciated!
First off I have no issues saying I am wrong when that is really the case. Here is one of them. I will try to keep this to the short version. After mulling over what to buy, the V8 4Runner or something else, I had the opportunity this spring to borrow a family member's F150 to tow the Rpod for a trip. I did expect it to be better but saying night and day difference does not understate it. At least for me when comparing to my V6 4.0L 4Runner. After a second trip with the same truck I was convinced that although buying a V8 4Runner (my preference for many reasons) would be better than I have now, the overall experience would not be as great as I really want. Living in the city neither my wife or I have the desire to drive a full size dual cab pickup truck. It's not practical in anyway. That said the Ford Expedition has the same engine and is both big enough for a better towing experience and "small" enough to still drive in the city. We found a nice low mileage one recently and scooped it up. Fast forward to this last weekend and we took out the Expedition for it's first Rpod towing trip. Towed without an issue, easily pulling up mountain passes. We are happy with this decision! Now just need to figure out how to carry the bikes. :) Thanks again for putting up with my question here. I am sure some of you responding were having thoughts "Again! Will this topic ever end?". As a new RV tower I simply needed to experience the mediocre and the good to know it myself. Cheers and happy RV'ing to all of you! |
|
|
2016 R178
2007 Ford Expedition V8 5.4L |
|
|
|
|
Bugout
Senior Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2017 Location: S caroline Online Status: Offline Posts: 117 |
Posted: 12 Jun 2017 at 9:55am |
|
I love my v8
|
|
|
Jk Aiken South Carolina 2016 178 Toyota Tundra 2017 4.6
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 2345> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Pushing The Limits On Tow Vehicles