R-Pod 195 sneak peak teaser |
Post Reply | Page <1 34567 8> |
Author | |
furpod
Moderator Group - pHp Joined: 25 Jul 2011 Location: Central KY Online Status: Offline Posts: 6128 |
Topic: R-Pod 195 sneak peak teaser Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 10:43am |
Right now, Couch's has the very last 177 produced, sitting on their lot..
|
|
lostagain
Senior Member Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2587 |
Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 1:50pm |
The new 195 looks similar to Pacific Coachworks, Mighty-Lite 18FB https://www.pacificcoachworks.com/travel-trailers/mighty-lite/mighty-lite-travel-trailer-18fb/
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6288 |
Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 2:17pm |
The only thing alike with them is the front walk-around queen bed. Otherwise, the layout is very different.
|
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
|
lostagain
Senior Member Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2587 |
Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 3:03pm |
The functional space is about the same, though the galley is in the back on the 195, it is basically the same size. The head is on the side in the 195 and in the back on the 18FB, but the volume of each is about the same. I looked at the live version of the Pac. Coach. trailer last summer at one of our local dealers. Its construction seems to be at about the same quality level as the generic rPod product. The tankage may be a little different, but functionally, there isn't much difference. Both trailers are going after the same market segment. From the fotos of the 195, I think FR's choice if finishes and such are a little nicer, but the price of the 18FB that I looked at was considerably less than that expected for the 195. Oh, and one other thing about the 18FB, the mattress was a throw away. They should sell them sans mattress and let the buyer get her own.
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
GlueGuy
Senior Member Joined: 15 May 2017 Location: N. California Online Status: Offline Posts: 2629 |
Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 4:49pm |
|
|
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River 2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost |
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6288 |
Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 5:54pm |
Given that the tank capacities of the 18FB are 25 gallons fresh (which presumably includes the 6 for the water heater meaning actually a 19 gallon tank unless they are not including the water heater in the fresh water capacity) and 26 gallons each for black and gray, it would make the 18FB less desirable for me. The one thing that piqued my interest was the "Heat Pads." That may mean that the tanks are heated for 4 season use. If so, one would need to be connected to shore power or have a great charging system for the TV to run them. I don't see them running on battery power alone.
|
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
|
lostagain
Senior Member Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2587 |
Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 7:36pm |
I really like our Pod, so I never discussed the trailer's characteristics in detail with the dealer and can't justify taking on a bunch of debt to replace a paid for trailer to gain a shower stall. But I think the all the tanks are 25 gallons, so there'd be 31 gal. of fresh water as there is really 36 with the Pod's 30 gallon tanks. I also didn't like the color scheme -- too gray for my taste, though it seems to be the popular style. The galley in the pictures of the 195 is more stylish, with the 18FB being much more like the traditional pods in finish. Also, the fridge was the same size as the traditional pods, if my memory serves me well. Bottom line, the trailer is in the same market as the rPod and offers, based on the dealer's price, a reasonably good value for the buck. But, as I said, why go into debt when you're happy with what you have?
Oh, and as for the tank heaters, they really suck up the power so I don't think they'd really be that useful unless you were at a full service rv park and even then, the heating efficiency is not necessarily adequate to keep things from freezing in the pipes. A corollary to the refrain "don't fix it if it ain't broke." ..."Don't buy a new one if you are happy with whatcha already got."
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6288 |
Posted: 08 Mar 2019 at 8:38pm |
My thoughts too on the heater pads. As long as I can continue to climb over my wife, we will likely stick with our 179. When I can't do that, I can use my modified dinette. In that case, I may reduce the queen mattress size and make some cabinetry in the front end of the 'Pod. While I would like to go with the 195 because of multiple features with it that I like, finances dictate sticking with what we have for now. We just plunked down almost 3K on the new axle, brakes, hub, and slide-out leak repair so money for trading isn't necessarily there and won't be for a while. That is okay since it won't even be available for several months.
|
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
|
offgrid
Senior Member Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
Posted: 09 Mar 2019 at 7:08am |
Exaclly. GM decided to "badge engineer" the Pontiac, which then destroyed its brand distinctiveness. Brand is a corporate asset, companies spend millions of dollars and decades developing their brand images. Brand is often the most valuable asset a company has when its sold. Did GM squander this value unnecessarily? Maybe they decided only a few of us old geezers cared. Who knows? But its gone now for sure. Is FR doing the same by compromising the original (highly successful) concept behind the r-pod brand as a light, compact travel trailer with a unique roofline? I think yes, others will disagree. Time will tell. As Honda has made the Civic larger over time they did not retain the original "small" Civic. Instead, they introduced the Fit as the smallest car in their US product line. By doing it that way they have retained the distinctiveness of both product lines while being able to cash in on existing Civic customers' desire for a larger vehicle as they aged. Smart strategy that worked well for them. FR is not doing that (so far) with the r-pod. As to manufacturers making what customers want in order to survive, that is not how marketing led companies work. Companies that are sales driven have a short planning horizon and want to make what customers tell them they want today. Successful marketing driven companies filter what sales is telling them about their customers, assess their own and their competitor's producs and capabilities, and then plan their product lines and marketing materials to "teach" customers what they ought to want. Best example of this in history? The iPhone. My concern with having a "big fat" r-Pod in the lineup is that it creates a muddle, customers will no longer know what an r-Pod is and isn't as distinct from other products in the market. Maybe FR has decided that most everyone who wants a "small" r-pod has already bought one, or maybe they are planning a new "small" product line like Honda did, or maybe they are being short sighted. Again, time will tell. All that being said, if you like the new "big fat" r-pod, buy it, nothing wrong with that. I'm sure it will be a good product. Its too big for me. |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6288 |
Posted: 09 Mar 2019 at 8:59am |
I'm wondering how hard it would be to reengineer our 179 to do a twin bed layout. Negatives are the wardrobe in the way which would need to be re-worked to allow foot room and the lack of space for the slide-side as well.
|
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 34567 8> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |