R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Camping Adventures
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Whats pulling your RPod
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Whats pulling your RPod

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3536373839 45>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Whats pulling your RPod
    Posted: 20 Sep 2009 at 8:59am
< ="-" ="text/; =utf-8">< name="ProgId" ="Word.">< name="Generator" ="Microsoft Word 11">< name="Originator" ="Microsoft Word 11">

2009 Volkswagen Tiguan/ R-pod 171 review

 

I thought I’d give a little input on towing the RP-171 with our VW Tiguan now that we’ve travelled with it a few weeks. You’ll have to forgive me with the metric and standard conversions. (Being old school I tend to talk in both languages.)

 

When we purchased our Pod in Dieppe New Brunswick, I had to have the vehicle outfitted with a towing package as it didn’t have one at time of purchase. The installation of the class 3 hitch was very straight forward and installed in under and hour. The hitch shop did however have some difficulties installing the brake controller. It had something to with the Electronic Stabilization Program/ anti-lock ABS brake system that VW has on its newer vehicles. However, after making some phone calls the shop finally ended up using a Valley Industries Journey HD 52740 electronic brake controller which solved the problem.

 

Our 2009 Tiguan has the 200 horsepower 2.0 L, 4-cylinder, in-line, turbocharged engine with a 6 speed 4-motion automatic transmission. The vehicle is rated for 998 kilograms or roughly 2200 lbs. so we’re pretty much pushing the limit for what the vehicle is rated when we’re towing the 171.

 

Towing on the four lane at 110 km/hr (70 mph), the vehicle handles the trailer very well, however, fuel consumption goes way up, and you definitely have to switch to manual shifting mode on the transmission. For those of you who have ever been to the Maritimes, you’ll know about our rolling hills (that we call mountains) here in Nova Scotia. The car/trailer handles these very well, and I would recommend staying under 100 km./hr (60 mph), just because the fuel consumption is so much better.

 

Linda and I like to stay on the secondary highways so the speed thing isn’t a problem, and best mileage is obtained at 80 to 90 km. / hr. (50 to 55 mph).  The last trip we made was about two hundred miles and the cars computer showed us averaging 17.8 miles per gallon. This was pulling some pretty heavy hills on the Glooscap Trail.

 

The car is very responsive and passing isn’t an issue with the trailer behind it. I like the narrower design of the trailer, with the fenders outboard of the body, and find that my regular vehicle side mirrors are more than adequate for seeing behind.

 

I like how you can park the trailer in those tight little spots that you would normally have to pass by with a larger trailer.

 

Our last RV was a 32 foot class ‘A’ motor home. While it was very comfortable, we always felt a little conspicuous pulling into a camping spot with smaller tents and tent trailers around. We used to get that “God, I hope he’s not going to park that thing there” gaze as we drove by.

 

The R-pod is a very classy looking little RV that really stands out when you pull it into a campground, yet has the appearance that isn’t intimidating to the campers next door. It’s welcoming size and unique paint scheme compliments just about any vehicle it’s towed behind.

 

You’re all correct about attracting attention. Everyone wants to have a look inside when I tell them there’s a shower, dinette, and a queen size bed in it!

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Sep 2009 at 2:39pm
We tow our 171 with a Ford Ranger w/ tow package.  I believe we are rated to pull 4,000 lbs.  The truck has no problems on level ground, but you can definitely tell you're pulling something up long hills. Tachometer goes from 2k rpm to 3k uphill.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Sep 2009 at 12:54pm
I bought my 171 with my new Toyota Highlander, V6, 4x4, 5k towing in mind. However, I needed to get wiring done on the Highlander and a brake controller so I used my 07 Tundra, 5.7, 4x4 to pick up the 171 and I'm continuing to tow with the Tundra. Its a longbed with ARE topper which provides lots of covered storage space and still has room for as many as 6 people to ride. I'm getting 11 to 12mpg and have plenty of power when needed. Based on readings on this site, I began thinking the Highlander may get no more MPG than the Tundra so why make the change - the only problem is finding parking spaces for the Tundra - its a few inches over 21 feet long making the combination approx 40 feet.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Sep 2009 at 9:22pm
We bought the POD because it was cute and had so much for a small trailer, but we also didn't want to buy a bigger vehicle, we had a Chrysler Pacifica that was supposed to be able to pull about 3500 lbs. We pulled the 173 twice with it and decided it was just not a good match. The mileage went down to 6.5 miles per gallon and it really struggled on even the smaller hills on the highway. God was good to us and placed a Dodge 2500 Ram Van in our path and we were able to get it at a reasonable price, so now we use a 12 passenger van to pull the Pod and have lots of room for other toys and fun things to take with us. We went out this past weekend to Wichita Falls for the Hotter-than-Hell and had a great time and the van pulled it with ease. The gas mileage was better than the Pacifica but even if it hadn't been, it was better having a V8 with some power to pull our Pod around easily. There may me some V6 vehicles that will pull it well, but I think we will stick with the V8 and feel more secure..... We did have a great time and have yet to see another POD in our travels.....
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Sep 2009 at 2:38pm
SmileWe will be using a RAV4 V6 with factory tow package for our 171.
Back to Top
yizit View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2009
Location: Wis. Dells, WI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 663
Post Options Post Options   Quote yizit Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2009 at 3:51pm
There is a lot to consider when figuring how much a tow vehicle can handle.  Not only do you have to consider the weight of the trailer, but also anything you put into it and what you put into your tow vehicle.  Here is a web site that explains GVWR:
http://www.rversonline.org/ArtWtandBal.html

Former owner of 2009 172
Darlene & Jim, Ewok our Lhasa
Roada our 2004 Roadtrek C190Popular


Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2009 at 1:18pm
When we purchased the Tucson - we never had in mind towing anything, it has been a pure joy to drive and has been ultra reliable.

I was shocked to see that it was rated at 2,000, probably reasonable for a smal 2.7 l. V6

I guess we need new wheels first, R-Pod second.

Considering a Honda Pilot.

Thanks.

Denis
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2009 at 12:53pm
We're using a Toyota Rav4 (6 cylinder). No problems ....
Back to Top
gmandual View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 246
Post Options Post Options   Quote gmandual Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2009 at 12:39pm
Denis,
 
Unfortunatly all of the RPods (including the 150's) are going to be beyond the capabilities of the Tucson to tow.   The lightest 150 is 1937lb's unloaded base weight.     And have a feeling that the tongue weight 240lb is going to be way over what the vehicle can handle.
There is no way you are going to be able to tow an R-Pod with a Hyundai Tuscon safely and without doing possible damage to the Tow vehicle.
 
 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2009 at 11:19am
Wondering if anyone knows how a Hyundai Tucson 2.7 V6 4WD would do with the R-Pod ?

It is rated for 2,000...Dead

Regards to all.

Denis
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3536373839 45>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz