MPG towing R POD - Event Date: 27 Apr 2017 |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |
GLBCamper
Senior Member Joined: 30 Jun 2015 Location: Oregon Online Status: Offline Posts: 274 |
Calendar Event: MPG towing R POD Posted: 28 Apr 2017 at 12:51pm |
I have read (actually I think in my Taco manual) to never use cruise control while towing. Not sure why that is, but I don't use it.
|
|
Old: 2014 177 HRE
2015 Tacoma V6 4x4 Double Cab New: 2016 EVO ATS 200rd 2016 F150 4x4 Sport |
|
RichC
Groupie Joined: 24 Feb 2017 Location: Chicago Online Status: Offline Posts: 70 |
Posted: 28 Apr 2017 at 12:42pm |
Just back yesterday from our second 171 shake-down trip. Last time with a heavy cross wind much of the way and, not familiar with towing this trailer (I have an enclosed utility trailer, have driven semis and all kinds of work trailers)
we got 12.25 mpg with our Toyota Sienna.
This time, with somewhat less wind, going 60 we got 12.8 mpg. The main difference between first trip and this was that on trip one I tried to use cruise control at 65+. Toyota was shifting like crazy. This time cruise control worked great -- 60 was the sweet spot. Plan to make next trip with a good tail wind.
|
|
2017 RP171
2018 Ford Explorer |
|
ToolmanJohn
Senior Member Joined: 23 Apr 2014 Location: Connecticut Online Status: Offline Posts: 451 |
Posted: 28 Apr 2017 at 5:32am |
A reasonable calculation would be to divide your normal highway mpg by 2. That result will be typical. (example: 22mpg highway not towing, would be 11 mpg highway towing ). A diesel would not be much higher, but a diesel will tow with less effort, especially in hilly terrain. The diesel usually have considerably more torque at lower engine RPM's.
Newer turbocharged gas engines are becoming impressively more powerful. The 3.5 twin turbo ecobooost is really amazing. Not sure what fuel economy would be but it's powerful. My 3.0 liter diesel gets 29 mpg not towing on highway, and I was getting 15 mpg towing a 177 from Connecticut to northern Vermont (240 miles each way through very hilly highway). On relatively flat highway sections (RARE in Connecticut) I would see 22 mpg towing on I-84 east for 20 miles. The nicer thing about a diesel is setting cruise and leaving it in Drive. No hunting for gears even at 65mph. |
|
2017 ATC 7X20 Custom Toy Hauler
2013 R-Pod 177 (SOLD) 2013 VW Touareg TDI |
|
podrunner
Senior Member Joined: 30 May 2013 Location: Draper, UT Online Status: Offline Posts: 106 |
Posted: 28 Apr 2017 at 12:04am |
Using premium fuel seems to have increased my mpg by about 20%. It is worth the extra cost.
Happy trails.... |
|
2010 R Pod 151
2017 4runner 2006 Honda Metropolitan |
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6326 |
Posted: 27 Apr 2017 at 7:00pm |
There is one. The Wingmaster Turbowing Air Deflector. It is very nice looking and since it is made of metal, would stand up to high speeds. |
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
|
jato
Senior Member Joined: 23 Feb 2012 Location: Kewadin, MI Online Status: Offline Posts: 3252 |
Posted: 27 Apr 2017 at 4:50pm |
So let's make that many many many many times now. My 1994 Ford F-150 5.0L V-8 with 309,000 miles and 31 deer kills, 10 mpg. 2008 Ford Explorer, now sold, 12 mpg. Current 2013 Ford 3.5L V-6 12.5 mpg. As others have said, mpg doesn't count here, enjoy the camping experience, enjoy God's creation, enjoy others company you meet along the journey. |
|
God's pod
'11 model 177 '17 Ford F-150 4WD 3.5 Ecoboost Jim and Diane by beautiful Torch Lake "...and you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free." |
|
mcarter
podders Helping podders - pHp Joined: 07 Apr 2016 Location: Greenbrier, TN Online Status: Offline Posts: 3419 |
Posted: 27 Apr 2017 at 4:43pm |
The issues with diesel is multiple. First the vehicle is normally more expensive, second the cost of the fuel is more expensive and lastly the maintenance costs for a diesel over gas is significantly more expensive. As an example if you buy a Ford F-350, the diesel engine option is 8K over standard gas. You would have to do, significant traveling over a number of years to get a diesel to pay for its self in mileage alone. Not a good option for a light weight Pod. There is a purpose for diesels, but in my opinion not with a 3500 lb trailer.
|
|
Mike Carter
2015 178 " I had the right to remain silent, I just didn't have the ability." |
|
TheBum
Senior Member Joined: 26 Feb 2016 Location: Texas Online Status: Offline Posts: 1407 |
Posted: 27 Apr 2017 at 3:50pm |
The mileage with our 2012 V6 Highlander pulling a 179 is consistent with what others are getting: 11-13. If you really want better gas mileage, a diesel is about the only way to go. It's not an option for me because I'm highly sensitive to diesel fumes.
|
|
TylerK9
Newbie Joined: 20 Jun 2016 Location: Santa Fe, NM Online Status: Offline Posts: 35 |
Posted: 27 Apr 2017 at 3:47pm |
We have a 2006 F-150--5.4L, non ecoboost--and we get 9-12 MPG depending on terrain and wind. After reading StephanH's post, I might look into a wind deflector!
|
|
TheBum
Senior Member Joined: 26 Feb 2016 Location: Texas Online Status: Offline Posts: 1407 |
Posted: 27 Apr 2017 at 11:38am |
Now, if they'd only engineer a deflector that could stand up to 70-75 mph speeds...
|
|
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |