Print Page | Close Window

I was Sold the wrong WDH...What effects???

Printed From: R-pod Owners Forum
Category: R-pod Discussion Forums
Forum Name: I need HELP!!!
Forum Discription: Perplexed/need help with a problem - ask here
URL: http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=12572
Printed Date: 29 Apr 2024 at 12:57pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.64 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: I was Sold the wrong WDH...What effects???
Posted By: TearlessTom
Subject: I was Sold the wrong WDH...What effects???
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2019 at 9:58pm
Hi, Its me again.  

I told you I had lots of questions.

We picked up our R-Pod 180 last Wednesday.  I thought the WDH seemed to be very robust but having no experience with them I "ASSUMED" the dealer was selling me the correct size.

I spent a large portion of the weekend getting to know the R-Pod, and buying needed starter items and installing the rear stabilizers.

Today we hooked it up and drove in on the interstate a bit and went to a new Bucees that just opened up down the road. (first in our area OMG it the size of Walmart)  Anyway I was looking for some level ground to take measurements

The difference between my front are rear sprung with Weight Distribution  vs unsprung with both fresh and gray water mostly full   +1/8th inch and when I filled the gas tank on trunk they were basically neutral.

My TV is a 2014 Ford F-150 XLT  2-Wheel Drive

The trailer has a slight upward tilt at the tongue.  

It has 6 washers installed.
 I believe the ride could be better.  Not terrible but It is not a neutral feel. I think partial because of the slight upward tilt (less than half a bubble on a level)

But when I pulled out the paperwork I see they installed a 800-1200 lb hitch.   Quite a bit of overkill.

Will this hitch being rated so heavy effect the drive and handling or should I be grateful that I have a hitch that is rated for the full potential of my truck?

How do I correct the upward tilt?  Remove 1-2 washers?

Should I take it back and ask for a lighter  system?







-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0



Replies:
Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 12:33am
You may have too heavy of a hitch, but with the F-150 you could probably live with it. It will be a bit too stiff for the R-pod, but it will work.

How much is the upward tilt? When the trailer is disconnected, the top of the ball to the ground on the truck should be roughly equal to the top of the hitch to the ground. IOW, the trailer tongue and the ball on the hitch should be about the same height (disregarding the number of washers for now).

The number of washers will determine how much weight you're going to transfer. More washer = more weight. Fewer washers = less weight. I'm guessing you should only need a couple of washers, if that.

We have 2 (thick) washers on our E2 600/6000 hitch, and the transfer is pretty good.


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: furpod
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 6:51am
If you are nose up once set up, the hitch head needs to come down on the extension, you may need one with more drop then the one you have now.


-------------


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 7:08am
Tearless Tom, the dealer who sold you your hitch my have done just fine by you. Remember that the wdh lifts both the trailer tongue weight and the rear of your tow vehicle. 

The height of the ball is what sets the trailer tilt, that height setting and be adjusted independently from the hitch load rating. You do want the trailer level when the wdh is connected and tensioned so that you don't have to disconnect in order to have a level trailer overnight while travelling.

The front fender height is set by the spring bar tension. You should be able to adjust that tension to get the front fender height back to what it was when the TV was unloaded. By doing that you are assuring that the weight on the front axle is back where it should be for safe towing. Don't worry about the rear fender height, your objective is not to get the TV completely level and your rear axle will end up with more weight on it than without the trailer. 

What is affected by the rating of the wdh is the stiffness of the spring bars. If they're too stiff that will show up as a bouncy ride quality. That bounciness will be reduced the more load you have on your trailer tongue and in the rear of your tow vehicle. 

So before you readjust anything I suggest that you get your TV and trailer loaded up the way you will actually be using it so your maximum tongue weight is what it really will be. Otherwise you'll wind up doing the adjustment multiple times. 

I would for example drain the gray tank. That tank is behind the trailer axle so filling it reduces the tongue weight. If you plan on carrying full fresh water then fill the fresh tank up.  If you plan on any of the dual battery/propane cylinder mods then install those. Ditto with a better mattress if you're planning that. Load and fuel up your TV as you plan to travel as well. 

Then go through the wdh setup and adjustment process again, getting the trailer level and the front fenders back to their unloaded starting point. After that's all set, take the rig out on the road and see what you think of the ride. If it still feels too bouncy to you, then drop down one level on your whd spring bar rating. 

Good luck and enjoy!







-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 11:01am
Originally posted by furpod

If you are nose up once set up, the hitch head needs to come down on the extension, you may need one with more drop then the one you have now.


I am already at the bottom of the hitches extension.

My Ball and my level trailer are very close to equal. Probable about 1/4 inch.

I understand that the gray will remove some of the tongue weight but I was trying to simulate my approx. travel weight.   As I said in a previous post I come from a motorcycle camping background so I know how to pack light. Carrying all my gear I still wouldn't add much over 100lbs if that.

I think my distribution set up is pretty much where I need to be. I just feel the trailer nose should be down slightly about an inch maybe a tad more to level.   I think the springs are too heavy as I do feel a little bit of bounce and more sway than I think it should.    I don't have either when pulling my bass boat. (about 2,000 lbs)   

My front end:
unladen was 36.625
Laden trailer tongue only 36.5
Laden with tow bar spring it was 36.6875 @ 7 links.

Rear End:
Unladen 38.375
Laden trailer tongue only 37.5
Laden trailer w/ spring bar 37.25

Tongue height was 22.5 level. I forgot to measure it when attached to truck.


-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 11:48am
Seems odd that tensioning the wdh bars would decrease the front axle loading, which is what seems to be happening based on the increase in body height at the front axle. You might want to try tensioning the wdh a bit more to try to get it back around the 36.5 inches you had without the trailer.

If you’re lightly loading the rig as you plan to do travelling then you may not need a wdh at all for your setup. But if sounds like you might be experiencing some sway so would probably still need a way to address that.

-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 12:01pm
Originally posted by offgrid

Seems odd that tensioning the wdh bars would decrease the front axle loading, which is what seems to be happening based on the increase in body height at the front axle. You might want to try tensioning the wdh a bit more to try to get it back around the 36.5 inches you had without the trailer.

If you’re lightly loading the rig as you plan to do travelling then you may not need a wdh at all for your setup. But if sounds like you might be experiencing some sway so would probably still need a way to address that.


sorry rechecked my wife's notes and she does not think in a linear fashion like I do. Notes all over the place. Me I like spreadsheets.

Anyway I corrected the Numbers if you would like to take another look at them.

-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: furpod
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 12:37pm
Originally posted by TearlessTom

Originally posted by furpod

If you are nose up once set up, the hitch head needs to come down on the extension, you may need one with more drop then the one you have now.


I am already at the bottom of the hitches extension.



You can, and do, if needed, buy a longer/more drop, extension. My sister is towing her Pod with a F250, she needed 9 1/2 inches of drop to get her Pod level when hooked up.


-------------


Posted By: furpod
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 12:43pm
Your numbers also, still don't make sense.. Take the rear..

you say that with the trailer hooked up, your measurement was 37.5, then when you tensioned the WDH the rear LOWERED to 37.25.. They can't and don't work that way.. when you apply tension to the bars, they RAISE the rear of the truck, and lower the front of the truck.

Your front is the same, you show that the front of the truck went down when you put the hitch on, and UP when tension was applied...


-------------


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 1:13pm
Originally posted by furpod

Your numbers also, still don't make sense.. Take the rear..
you say that with the trailer hooked up, your measurement was 37.5, then when you tensioned the WDH the rear LOWERED to 37.25.. They can't and don't work that way.. when you apply tension to the bars, they RAISE the rear of the truck, and lower the front of the truck.
Your front is the same, you show that the front of the truck went down when you put the hitch on, and UP when tension was applied...


I know it doesn't make sense.. Is it possible with the springs being that strong 800-1200 lb that it is forcing the entire truck down. and the nose of the trailer up?

Why would my unhooked truck hitch and the trailer leveled measure almost the same. fraction of inch difference but then when hooked up it is pointing slightly upward. ??

-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 1:21pm
Generally, the tensioned bars on the WDH will UNLOAD the rear, and LOAD the front of the TV relative to what it would have been without the WDH.

So if you measure the height of the front and rear with the trailer connected and no WDH you will get front height X and rear height Y.

Tension the WDH bars; X should get smaller, and Y should get larger.


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: furpod
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 1:24pm
Without being there to look and measure, I have no answer for you. I can honestly say I have set up 20 or so WDH's over the years, and never saw measurements do that.

Honestly, with that particular truck/Pod combination, I would suggest you try towing with no WDH. Just get an appropriate drop hitch and roll. Many owners do it that way, with no issues.

The bar rating has nothing to do with how a WDH works. I know several podders rolling with 1000, even 1200 pound bars. The difference is just how much it takes to deflect the bars, not what they do.



-------------


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 2:54pm
I'm working today and tomorrow. I plan on hooking back up and take some more measurements.   I called the dealer today. The service manager was out but will check back tomorrow to discuss swapping to the WDH that I thought they were selling me.

-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 4:07pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBZu39pQ8Gg - This video gives a good explanation of how the front & rear of the TV react to using a WDH vs nothing vs adding air bags to the rear. 

The main take-away is that adding air bags actually increases the load on the rear axle and decreases the load on the front axle.


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 4:40pm
furpod is correct, the bar stiffness shouldn't effect the wdh loading. Think of the wdh as trying to fold up your rig around the ball. That will lift the rear axle and the ball/hitch and put more weight on the front axle and the trailer axle. Changing to a lower rated wdh won't change that, only the tension on the bars will.  

It seems like your're not seeing that effect, but that might be because you don't have enough tension on your bars to see it. And small differences in height are hard to measure.

 In the end furpod is probably right and you won't really need a wdh, but if you are taking more measurements anyway I'd suggest two things:  

If you're not already, use painters take on the fenders to take your axle measurements to. 

Try putting more tension on your wdh bars. In order to see much effect from them the tension needs to be in the hundreds of lbs range. 




-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 05 Feb 2019 at 12:42pm
I have an appointment for tomorrow to have the dealer change out the WH to a 600/6000 Fastway E2 and remove the Blue Ox 8,000 - 12,000lb system.
Hopefully it will work better and more adjustable.

-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 06 Feb 2019 at 6:40pm
Originally posted by GlueGuy

You may have too heavy of a hitch, but with the F-150 you could probably live with it. It will be a bit too stiff for the R-pod, but it will work.

How much is the upward tilt? When the trailer is disconnected, the top of the ball to the ground on the truck should be roughly equal to the top of the hitch to the ground. IOW, the trailer tongue and the ball on the hitch should be about the same height (disregarding the number of washers for now).

The number of washers will determine how much weight you're going to transfer. More washer = more weight. Fewer washers = less weight. I'm guessing you should only need a couple of washers, if that.

We have 2 (thick) washers on our E2 600/6000 hitch, and the transfer is pretty good.

GlueGuy, or anyone with the E2 600/6000 system .Especially if you have a Ford F150  could you possible send or include some photos of your set up , including the washers and thickness,  and how many holes top/bottom for the "L "bracket.  

I picked it up today and like the design better but it is still not quite right.   I took it up to Bucee's again for some flat ground and a BBQ sandwich.

The measurements are pretty good but needs improvement.   As they set it up I am over sprung as I understand it.

My Unlaiden (truck only) front wheel measurement was  : 36.625
My Trailer only measurement was :                                     36.875
My Trailer with WDH Bars attached :                                   36.3125

So my target height as I understand it is: between :  36.625 and 36.75

My rear wheel is:

My Unlaiden (truck only) rear  wheel measurement was  : 37.188
My Trailer only measurement was :                                     35.938
My Trailer with WDH Bars attached :                                   36.625

My Level trailer tongue height  is:         17.5
My trailer tongue height with WDH is     18.5
so I have a one inch upward tilt.

I have one hole left at the bottom of the hitch so if I drop it that should take care of the upward tilt.
And if I remove some washers. It has 6 now down to maybe 4 that should bring my front end up hopefully approx. 0.4 inch..

Is this right?

GlueGuy?
Anyone?






-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 06 Feb 2019 at 8:20pm
The hitch/ball assembly on our 2015 F-150 is all the way down; bottom holes. 

Likewise, the L brackets on the trailer are also all the way down. I guess that's the "top" holes, as the hang down. 

We have two really thick washers on the hitch head. 

I'll get you some pictures in the morning.


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: furpod
Date Posted: 06 Feb 2019 at 9:07pm
Tilting the head doesn't change the height of the tongue, It preloads the spring bars.

-------------


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 06 Feb 2019 at 9:37pm
Originally posted by furpod

Tilting the head doesn't change the height of the tongue, It preloads the spring bars.

I plan on lowering  both the hitch and the L bracket to  the lowest position to lower the hitch height . Now debating on how many washers to use.  I understand that less transfer less weight to the front and as I am over-sprung  by about 0.4 inch with a full fresh water container.  By lowering the tongue I will be increasing the tongue weight so it may need slightly more adjustment. 

It is currently has 6 washers.  GlueGuy has 2,  Others 3 - 4.   I will try somewhere in that range.

Thanks for the help.



-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 5:15am
Tearless Tom, lowering the tongue doesn’t change the tongue weight. The trailer is like a teeter totter, once you lift your kid sitting on the other end off the ground the weight stays the same.

As I understand the way that particular wdh works, the sway resistance is created by friction of the bars sliding in their holders. So, there needs to be a decent amount of tension on the bars for it to work. IOW, I suggest you keep some tension on the bars for better sway control even if that means the TV front end winds up a little lower. You have a very capable TV in the F150, it won’t hurt anything.


-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: David and Danette
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 8:02am
   As I had mentioned before I thought we needed more tongue weight when we owned our 171 so we bought a spare tire bracket from Norther Tool and attached it to the front A frame of our r-pod. Moving the spare tire to the front gave about 70 lbs. more weight to the tongue weight and that extra weight helped the camper tow better. I think maybe with your situation more tongue weight would be of help.

-------------
2018 Vista Cruiser 19BFD (2018-              
2012 Vibe 6503 (2014-2019)
2009 r-pod 171 (2009-2014)
Middle Tn
2014 Ram 1500 Quad cab




Posted By: lostagain
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 8:07am
I got a spare tire holder to put on the tongue of our 172 from Amazon.  It was a bolt on type that attached to one frame rail or the other.  I had no problem putting it on, but when I had to do a little sharp backing it got in the way.  I'd like to get a mounting system that would attach to both rails and hole the tire horizontally above the LP tank and batteries.  

Any ideas on where to look for one?


-------------
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 10:10am
Originally posted by offgrid

Tearless Tom, lowering the tongue doesn’t change the tongue weight. The trailer is like a teeter totter, once you lift your kid sitting on the other end off the ground the weight stays the same.

As I understand the way that particular wdh works, the sway resistance is created by friction of the bars sliding in their holders. So, there needs to be a decent amount of tension on the bars for it to work. IOW, I suggest you keep some tension on the bars for better sway control even if that means the TV front end winds up a little lower. You have a very capable TV in the F150, it won’t hurt anything.


I understand your point but not your logic or maybe you misunderstood mine.

I am lowering the tongue because it is at a slight upward tilt which as I understand is a bad thing. Can cause jack knifes in hard braking or bad weather.   It should be level or tilted slightly down. Mine is 1 inch higher  when attached to truck than it is when the trailer is level.   I need to get it down to level of just below.

I need to remove some washers as I am currently over-sprung about 1/2 inch. I am not concern about the actual weight  as stated my TV is more than adequate to handle it. 

Your analogy to a teeter totter (we call them see-saw down here because of the noise they make)
anyway your analogy is correct except for the fact that position of the axle makes it more of a fulcrum  in reverse which will apply more weight with varying  angles shifting more of the trailer weight forward which is fine for the tongue but I need to decrease the load off my front wheels as it is already more than it should be. Hence removing the washers.





-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 10:59am
Originally posted by offgrid

Tearless Tom, lowering the tongue doesn’t change the tongue weight. The trailer is like a teeter totter, once you lift your kid sitting on the other end off the ground the weight stays the same.

As I understand the way that particular wdh works, the sway resistance is created by friction of the bars sliding in their holders. So, there needs to be a decent amount of tension on the bars for it to work. IOW, I suggest you keep some tension on the bars for better sway control even if that means the TV front end winds up a little lower. You have a very capable TV in the F150, it won’t hurt anything.
Those are separate issues. You want the trailer to be close to level. That's why he needs to lower the hitch ball to get to a logical starting place. The height of the L brackets and the down-tilt to the hitch assembly will determine the amount of tension on the WDH.

The F-150 is way more than up to the task, and you could probably put as much or as little as the WDH could be set to. I think that you need to get "enough" tension to take advantage of the anti-sway capability of the E2 hitch.


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 1:23pm
Yes for sure 2 different issues GlueGuy, I agree.

Yes the trailer should be as level as you can reasonably make it, but at some point you’ll run out of things to adjust and need to call it good at that point. An inch is not going to be significant in the way it handles and won’t impact the tongue weight enough to notice. It will change a little with load variation too. I get your argument about the point of rotation being the tire contact patch and not the axle but an inch out of level will only shift the trailer forward or back by about 0.1 inch which is not going to be noticeable.

I’m sure you’re fine on the weight on your front wheels, but if you’re concerned about it you can go weigh each axle on a public scale and compare what you get to the F150s Gross axle weight ratings. That gives you the gross combined vehicle weight and the trailer axle weight too which are good to know.




-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 2:05pm
What I'm saying is that he's about an inch out of level, and the hitch assembly goes up/down about an inch at a time. Go for it. Start at a level place, or as close as you can get, and go on with the rest of it.

-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 2:41pm
+1 GlueGuy, I agree.

-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 8:49pm
Finally got it where I am happy with it.  There were quite a few errors I found in the dealers installation  which wasn't helping the performance of the hitch.

Everything was set up as a generic install, Not at all my truck and trailer specific which is what I thought I was paying for.  The hitch was one notch or an inch to high.  The hardware that mounts the L bracket was not properly mounted to the frame as I could put a finger between the frame and the bottom bolt so the L bracket was shifting as it could not be tighten down enough to hold it stable like that.

I understand why they did it.  My Propane tank line was run under the right side to the external propane connection on the right side.  It was a easy fix. I had to remove x1 3/8 self tapping screw and relocate the line.   Just dealer being LAZY!
The brackets were also not the correct distance  from the hitch.  Also some washers lock washers were missing and a mixture of No-stop and nuts with lock washers were used.

So  I dropped the hitch height by one notch or about one inch.   I removed some washers. I ended up at 3. and my L bracket with 2 holes open below the frame.  I felt this gave me a good balance between sway control, while decreasing the up down bounce from the hitch being too high .  My front end height is currently 1/10 inch over sprung.  I can live with that.  I may experiment some more later but for now the ride is good and the sway seems to have been mostly eliminated and it tracks well. Big smile

Thanks again for everyone input and help.  



-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 9:16pm
Good to hear Tom! Your F-150 is a beast for pulling something like the RP-179. We have had absolutely zero issues with ours. It tows like a dream. No muss, no fuss, no sweat, no bother. Just exactly what you need on a camping trip.

-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 9:35pm
Originally posted by GlueGuy

Good to hear Tom! Your F-150 is a beast for pulling something like the RP-179. We have had absolutely zero issues with ours. It tows like a dream. No muss, no fuss, no sweat, no bother. Just exactly what you need on a camping trip.

Thanks you were a big help..  

I did find it curious that  with 2 washers and the L bracket in the position you use  vs 3 washers and the L bracket with 2 holes left under the frame (one hole lower than yours)  gave me the exact same front wheel height but I felt with 3 washers I was getting a bit more sway control.

Probable all in my head but then again maybe not?


-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 07 Feb 2019 at 10:14pm
Originally posted by TearlessTom

Originally posted by GlueGuy

Good to hear Tom! Your F-150 is a beast for pulling something like the RP-179. We have had absolutely zero issues with ours. It tows like a dream. No muss, no fuss, no sweat, no bother. Just exactly what you need on a camping trip.

Thanks you were a big help..  

I did find it curious that  with 2 washers and the L bracket in the position you use  vs 3 washers and the L bracket with 2 holes left under the frame (one hole lower than yours)  gave me the exact same front wheel height but I felt with 3 washers I was getting a bit more sway control.

Probable all in my head but then again maybe not?
No worries Tom. The WDH distributes some of the tongue weight to the front wheels, and a smaller amount to the axle of the trailer. I don't think you have to worry at all how much is actually going to the front wheels of your particular truck.

There may be a minor concern about how much is transferred to the trailer axle (the RP-179 axle is just adequate for a fully loaded RP-179). So it's theoretically possible to overload the R-pod axle, but you would still have to work on it a bit.

Also, our 2015 F-150 is a complete re-design of the truck (from prior years), and I think there is enough difference between the 2014 and the 2015 to make some minor rigging changes. 


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 08 Feb 2019 at 2:22am
Glad it’s worked out for you Tearless Tom. One reason for the setup difference might be trailer wheel size and ride height. Maybe I missed it but what wheels and lift setup do you have? If normal for the Midwest/East you will be sitting a little lower than GlueGuy.





-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: TheBum
Date Posted: 08 Feb 2019 at 11:33am
As I recall, I had to install the E2 L-brackets on our 179 at a little shorter distance than ideal due to the location of the propane bottle mount, but still within the spec'ed range.

-------------
Alan
2022 R-Pod 196 "RaptoRPod"
2022 Ram 1500 Lone Star 4x4
Three cats


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 08 Feb 2019 at 2:44pm
Originally posted by TheBum

As I recall, I had to install the E2 L-brackets on our 179 at a little shorter distance than ideal due to the location of the propane bottle mount, but still within the spec'ed range.


Mine were jammed up next to the propane tanks. I moved it aft about an inch or so. They measure 3.5 inches from the tip of the spring bar to the center of the hole. I read somewhere it had to be at least 3 inches and the further back you put the bracket the less effect it has on the weight distribution. Moving mine back made about 1/10 of an inch difference with the same set up.

-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: lostagain
Date Posted: 08 Feb 2019 at 3:33pm
Tearless Tom, Fastway has their installation and set up instructions online http://here:%20www.fastwaytrailer.com/pdf/e2-round-bar-hitch-instructions.pdf - here: https://www.fastwaytrailer.com/pdf/e2-round-bar-hitch-instructions.pdf
You should have been given a copy by your dealer.  
When the dealer set up our hitch, among other errors, they set the L brackets too far aft so that I had <3" of distance from the middle of the bracket to the end of the bar.  I moved it forward to have about the same distance as you ended up with.  The propane tank mount is a problem for getting the L brackets in the right place, but you should be able to get it close enough.  The other thing the dealer failed to do was to torque any of the bolts to the proper tightness.  Thankfully nothing happened before I caught it.


-------------
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 08 Feb 2019 at 3:37pm
The further aft the brackets are the longer the distance is from the bracket to the ball. That should increase the moment (torque) the bars are putting on the rig trying to fold it up around the ball, which increases the weight being redistributed.
Since the torque is force x distance, if you move the brackets aft and at the same time lower them to reduce the force pulling up on the bars, you end up with the same amount of weight distributed.


-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: lostagain
Date Posted: 08 Feb 2019 at 4:13pm
And if you move the brackets too far back, the bars will not be long enough in some sharp turns, leading to them becoming disengaged from the L brackets.  

-------------
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 09 Feb 2019 at 12:05pm
Originally posted by offgrid

Glad it’s worked out for you Tearless Tom. One reason for the setup difference might be trailer wheel size and ride height. Maybe I missed it but what wheels and lift setup do you have? If normal for the Midwest/East you will be sitting a little lower than GlueGuy.




I'm sure that is it. He runs 15 inch tires as I have 14. He has a 2015 4WD truck mine is a 2014 2 wheel.

The 2015 is a lighter truck in the rear end and the 4wd normally have a bit higher stance so it is only logical that with those minor differences it will give us different settings.

-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 09 Feb 2019 at 12:29pm
Perhaps a bit off topic Tearless Tom but if you don't have the axle riser kit on your rPod you might want to consider adding it, seems like most folks on the forum including me tend to feel that the standard East/Midwest rPods have inadequate ground clearance. 

-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 09 Feb 2019 at 1:17pm
Right. Except that both trucks say "Ford F-150" in their names, there are numerous differences. Ours is an HRE RP-179 (higher stance) with 15" tires (another 1/2"higher).

Our F-150 is the 2015 "all aluminum" one, plus 4WD, plus the extended 157" wheelbase; all of which make it taller.

None-the-less, the basic rules for setting up the WDH still hold.


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2019 at 12:00pm
Okay guys I've done a lot more reading and research and crawling under the Pod etc.

I have found that they changed the axle "clocking" a year or two prior to my 2017 being made. To verify my axle is "clocked" at about the 4:00 - 4:30 position so it is already raised a bit vs prior years that as I understand it the risers were made for.

So from what I've read Risers are not needed for my Pod because of the axle clocking.

Is this correct?

Also, I still want to change to the 15 inch tire for peace of mind with an increased load rating and speed rating. Not planning on over loading or speeding but I do like the idea of the added safety margin that they give.

I know I need to measure the wheel well clearance but haven't thought of it when I had a tape measure in my hand.


Most suggest the 205/75/15   is the 225/75/15 too much of a increase in height and width over the 205/75/14 which I have on now?????

205/75/14   =   26.1 height   8.1 width
205/75/15   =   27.1 height   8.1 width
225/75/15   =   28.3 height   8.9 width.

-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2019 at 1:31pm
Originally posted by TearlessTom

Okay guys I've done a lot more reading and research and crawling under the Pod etc.

I have found that they changed the axle "clocking" a year or two prior to my 2017 being made. To verify my axle is "clocked" at about the 4:00 - 4:30 position so it is already raised a bit vs prior years that as I understand it the risers were made for.

So from what I've read Risers are not needed for my Pod because of the axle clocking.

Is this correct?
I think that's correct. Our 2017 HRE does not have the risers.

Originally posted by TearlessTom

Also, I still want to change to the 15 inch tire for peace of mind with an increased load rating and speed rating. Not planning on over loading or speeding but I do like the idea of the added safety margin that they give.

I know I need to measure the wheel well clearance but haven't thought of it when I had a tape measure in my hand.


Most suggest the 205/75/15   is the 225/75/15 too much of a increase in height and width over the 205/75/14 which I have on now?????

205/75/14   =   26.1 height   8.1 width
205/75/15   =   27.1 height   8.1 width
225/75/15   =   28.3 height   8.9 width.
The difference in radius of the 205/75/14 and the 205/75/15 is a half inch. I would measure the amount of space you have between the smaller tire and decide if you could tolerate a half inch less of it.


-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2019 at 1:56pm
I'm under the impression that the torsion axle start angle change (aka clocking) doesn't quite give you the same height as the riser kit, but I might be wrong. 

My suggestion is to measure as GlueGuy says and then get the LRD one with the highest load rating that you have clearance for  Since you're getting new wheels too be sure to check the load rating on those, you're only as good as your weakest link. I got these, both tires and wheels rated for 2540 lbs. It also saves the mounting cost. 

https://www.easternmarine.com/loadstar-st225-75r-15-radial-tire-aluminum-split-spoke-rim-5-lug-lrd - https://www.easternmarine.com/loadstar-st225-75r-15-radial-tire-aluminum-split-spoke-rim-5-lug-lrd


-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: TearlessTom
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2019 at 8:03am
Originally posted by offgrid


I'm under the impression that the torsion axle start angle change (aka clocking) doesn't quite give you the same height as the riser kit, but I might be wrong. 
My suggestion is to measure as GlueGuy says and then get the LRD one with the highest load rating that you have clearance for  Since you're getting new wheels too be sure to check the load rating on those, you're only as good as your weakest link. I got these, both tires and wheels rated for 2540 lbs. It also saves the mounting cost. 
https://www.easternmarine.com/loadstar-st225-75r-15-radial-tire-aluminum-split-spoke-rim-5-lug-lrd - https://www.easternmarine.com/loadstar-st225-75r-15-radial-tire-aluminum-split-spoke-rim-5-lug-lrd



Are you having any wheel well clearance issues with that tire? That was my biggest concern .
Do you have risers on yours or not. That is the set up I was wanting to order.

Oh by the way I attempted to measure my wheel well clearance last night with a steel tape I had handy. Clearance with the 205/75x14 was approx. 3.25 - 3.5 inches.


-------------
Tearless Tom
2017 R-Pod 180
2014 Ford F-150 XLT 2WD 5.0


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2019 at 8:58am
No wheel clearance issues, and yes I have the risers. FWIW, the trailer also looks much better balanced with the bigger wheels on it.

-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com