R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > I need HELP!!!
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Speed limits on freeway
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSpeed limits on freeway

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Speed limits on freeway
    Posted: 31 Mar 2021 at 6:50am
Jato, sounds like your area like many others is severely overpopulated with deer. By some measures there are now 100x as many white tails in the eastern us than there were 100 years ago, when there was concern that the species might go extinct. No predators, less hunters, and the spread of suburbia (deer thrive in areas of mixed woods and cleared land) have caused a real problem. They destroy native forest plants, wreak havoc on the ecosystem, destroy crops and gardens, and spread Lyme disease. Generally they don't die off from starvation either, just expand their population till they're always on the verge of starvation and can't expand it any more. Not to mention. The 150 or so ppl who get killed every year hitting them. It's not uncommon to look out my window in the early evening and see 15 or so in a couple groups.

We try to avoid travelling in late afternoon/evening and early morning, drive slowly especially in areas where deer tend to congregate, and stop when we see one ahead because there are usually a couple more right behind them.
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
jato View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Location: Kewadin, MI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3227
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2021 at 5:39am
Originally posted by Dirt Sifter

Accidents are accidents, crashes are crashes, each determined on their own merits. But I wouldn't want to be your insurance carrier.Star


Fortunately, for both the company and the insurance carrier, none of the accidents or hits were ever turned in to the insurance carrier.  Fortunately the majority of the accidents were toward the front of the truck which had a substantial bumper and sat up rather high.

With my current vehicles I am quite certain there would be substantial damage were another 'encounter' to take place, even with the 2017 F-150 as its stock front bumper is pretty chincey.
God's pod
'11 model 177
'17 Ford F-150 4WD 3.5 Ecoboost
Jim and Diane by beautiful Torch Lake
"...and you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free."
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2587
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2021 at 1:42am
As I stated above, "Most "accidents" involve some level of carelessness or negligence in the root cause, but lack an intent to result in some injury."  It appears that we all agree on that point.  Most accidents, or crashes, occur because someone didn't use reasonable care to avoid it, whether driving too fast, failing to pay attention, not anticipating the dangers, and so on.  

The point is that an "accident, "crash," "mishap," "misadventure," and so on, are all believed to be sudden events that result in some injury or damage and that occurred without anyone's direct intention.  There are many terms that one can use to describe this kind of sudden unintentional event, some implying blame and others emphasizing the unpredictable and unintentional aspect of the situation.  

It's really a semantic issue and depends on the user's desire to either blame or excuse the conduct of the actor involved in the event.  Since it's a semantic issue, the choice of words used to describe it necessarily depends on the point of view of the person judging the conduct and selecting the word to describe it.  

There is a danger in using words to describe preventable injury producing events as though they are beyond human control, implying that the conduct of the person causing the injury or damage is excusable.  In that respect, we have developed over a few hundred years terms that differentiate between levels of lack of due care and sanction them differently.  We treat extreme indifference to safety as almost intentional conduct, i.e. willful and wanton conduct, and allow criminal punishment of the actor.  We treat gross negligence as worse than minor carelessness and allow punitive damages to be awarded in a civil court, in addition to compensatory damages.  Further, our tolerance for intemperate conduct has evolved.  We used to treat, for example, an "accident" involving drunk driving as relatively minor form of carelessness and have now elevated it to a serious criminal offense. 

In the last analysis, we each have to take responsibility for our conduct and its consequences.  


Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
Tars Tarkas View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Location: Near Nashville
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2021 at 11:06pm
There are often accidents, or whatever you want to call them, that are avoidable, but I've hit a couple of deer and I swear, one of them was unavoidable on my part.  The deer could have easily avoided it, it jumped in front of me from out of nowhere and hit me (sic) within a second of first coming in sight.  I wasn't speeding.

All that said, I generally agree with Offgrid that many, many, "accidents" can be prevented through education, training, good judgement, etc.  I don't mean to exclude myself; I just haven't figured out 25  years later what I could have reasonably done differently with that deer.  It was really like the deer decided to commit suicide and pulled it off without a flaw.

TT
2010 176
FJ Cruiser
Back to Top
Dirt Sifter View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2018
Location: Right side OR
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2021 at 8:09pm
Jato, I think you must hold the record for the number of deer hit with your vehicle. I've creamed a number much, much smaller and felt all of them were accidental on my part. Perhaps it is a lapse of judgement as my immediate supervisor claimed (but was over ridden by the next level) when one of my troopers hit his third deer in twelve months. My supervisor challenged my calling it unavoidable because he said the trooper was traveling ten mph over the designated speed limit without justifiable need, in his opinion. My response was that it was a justifiable speed and further if he'd been traveling twenty mph over he would have been clear of the area where the deer jumped the guard rail before it was there. Accidents are accidents, crashes are crashes, each determined on their own merits. But I wouldn't want to be your insurance carrier.Star
Greg n Deb 2020 195 HRE
'07 Tundra 5.7L., '17 Tacoma 3.5L. Both with tow packages
1 Puggle, 1 Chihuahua support staff
Back to Top
jato View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Location: Kewadin, MI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3227
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2021 at 6:14pm
+1 Bravo offgrid.  I may humbly be able to say i have experienced more "accidents" involving deer than anyone else on this forum.  As of two years ago when I retired, the last truck i was driving (94 F-150 4x 5.0L V-8, 322,000 miles) was involved in 31 deer kills and over 100 hits over a period of 21 years, just for that truck alone.  Not including the previous kills/hits before that particular vehicle.  Fortunately the truck never got hurt enough to be considered totaled although it did carry a nasty smashed in driver side rear quarter panel that wasn't pretty.  What could I do to prevent these from happening?  Drive slow?  I got to the point of traveling at only 35 mph at 5 am when going to work, that didn't help either.  Tried riding my bicycle to work, a short 5 mile trip.  That was almost a disaster the 2nd time I did that as a large doe came within a couple feet of me and I was only traveling 19 mph.  At least I was safer in the cab of the truck.  Since retiring there have been numerous 'close calls.'  The only redeeming factor in all this is no longer am I traveling at 5 in the morning but again, many of these accidents happened at mid day and late afternoon, very few happened in the evening.  So maybe only travel at night?
God's pod
'11 model 177
'17 Ford F-150 4WD 3.5 Ecoboost
Jim and Diane by beautiful Torch Lake
"...and you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free."
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2021 at 4:40pm
Accident:

an unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally, typically resulting in damage or injury.


In aviation, road, and industrial safety the modern approach is to view these events as the end result of a sequence of decisions and behaviors any one of which could have been changed and resulted in a different outcome.

So there indeed are very few true accidents, as podwerkz and podgeek rightly argue. This is not pc gibberish either, we are not powerless to prevent these events and they are not unexpected, nor are they unintentional since there are well understood behaviors that can be changed.

Just consider how many near misses there are for every OSHA reportable injury or how many close calls there are on the road for every crash. Those near misses are squandered learning opportunities, and when someone is injured or killed you can't simply shrug your shoulders and say there's nothing to be done. If you are the manager and one of your employees gets injured or you are the driver and someone in your or another vehicle gets injured you are responsible. Period. Because it is an intentional act to engage in or tolerate unsafe behaviors.

We at one point acquired a solar integrator with a great sales capability but they were abysmal installers. I had multiple crews of workers installing solar on roofs who among many other behaviors were not using proper fall protection. It's a PITA at first to work on a roof in harness if you've ever done it. There was also a lot of macho bs involved, real men don't wear fall protection. Unfortunately pretty common attitudes in the construction trades.

When you dug into it every single person on the crews had experienced at least one close call. They just didn't think about what those close calls were trying to teach them, even after a couple serious fall injuries had occurred. There was nothing at all accidental about those injuries, they were statically predictable with high confidence and caused by intentional behaviors.

It was very difficult to change those ingrained unsafe behaviors and not everyone made the journey. Some folks left on their own and some were fired. It required intense management commitment.

It's always management at fault, never the workers' fault. That's not bs either btw. You have to prove it when you say your employees' safety is more important than profit because they of course won't believe you. You can't tolerate unsafe attitudes and behaviors, even subtle ones because that is a test of your level of commitment.

In the end the crew members looked out for each other and the reportable fall injury rate dropped to zero. We began tracking near misses which is really a much better metric because if done well it gives you insight in advance into what unsafe behaviors remain or develop that are about to hurt or kill someone.

When you drive your personal rig you are your own manager so are 100% responsible for what happens.You can choose to learn from your own and others' close calls and not so safe behaviors and make changes or not, it's up to you.

stephenH for one has clearly learned from his experiences, he no longer runs a marginal tow vehicle and has the most complete anti sway setup of anyone on this forum. Belt and suspenders and another belt, it's impressive.

This is why it gripes me when for example I see things ike runnng a mid sized rpod behind a light tow vehicle without knowing your actual weights. That is an example of an unsafe behavior, it's wishful thinking and if an "accident" were to result due to being unable to control the rig it would be entirely predictable and avoidable.

Sorry for the rant but as the former manager of construction crews where people were getting injured on my watch I had to suck it up and can't just be quiet now when I see unsafe behaviors, including from fellow forum members. That makes me a PITA sometimes but I can easily live with that compared to the alternative. I know what that feels like too and it's not a good feeling at all.





1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2587
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2021 at 2:40pm
Even the term "crash" has to be contextualized to have meaning.  StephenH's crash/accident was completely beyond his control caused through no lack of due care on his part.  A crash/accident involving a drunken driver, on the other hand, is an utterly avoidable tragedy.  The term "crash" doesn't differentiate these any better than the common usage of "accident."  Bottom line, use what you like and see how its meaning is interpreted.
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
Pod_Geek View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 04 Dec 2019
Location: Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 260
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2021 at 1:58pm
Originally posted by lostagain

...It's hardly worth the bother to worry about using another more PC term in its place.


As is pointed out by many of the individuals/entities that are advocating the use of "crash" instead of "accident", words have meaning.  The term "accident" implies to many people that the event was no one's fault.  In many (most?) cases this is simply not true.

That ain't "PC" in my book.  It's more an acknowledgement of reality.
2020.5 R-Pod 195 Hood River
2018 RAM 2500 6.4L
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2587
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2021 at 1:22pm
Accident, as StephenH points out, are events that lack a specific intent to bring about the event causing injury or damage.  But, as Pod_Geek points out, the word accident covers quite a spectrum of conduct.  It ranges from practically intentional, in that the conduct leading to the "accident" was intentional and constituted a willful and wanton disregard for the safety of others -- such as driving 100 mph through a school zone when children are crossing the street -- to that which is beyond the control of anyone and is often referred to in the legal biz as an act of God, or in lay terms, s**t happens.  

Most "accidents" involve some level of carelessness or negligence in the root cause, but lack an intent to result in some injury.  Some levels of carelessness or negligence can be criminally sanctioned, while on the other extreme of the spectrum, some result only in the obligation to compensate the injured party who suffered a loss due to someone's negligence.  Finally, at the far end of the spectrum are events that one cannot anticipate that result in injuries, such a boulder being shaken loose by an earth quake and rolling down a hill, crushing your rPod as you tow it along the road well within the speed limit.  It was not caused by anyone's carelessness in acting or failing to act.  It is simply a matter of s**t happens.

We all consider the context of the event when we use the term "accident" and are not really confused by it.  It's hardly worth the bother to worry about using another more PC term in its place.

Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz